
BJP MP criticises Bengaluru’s proposed tunnel road project
NT Correspondent
Bengaluru: The proposed tunnel road project in Bengaluru, championed by Deputy CM DK Shivakumar, has sparked significant controversy. The project, aimed at easing traffic congestion by connecting Hebbal to Silk Board, has been met with strong opposition from the BJP, which argues for an alternative approach focused on expanding the Metro network and increasing the BMTC bus fleet. Bangalore Central BJP MP P C Mohan has raised concerns about the project, which is estimated to cost thousands of crores.
In a letter to the BBMP commissioner, Mohan called the tunnel project “unnecessary” and “unscientific,” claiming that it would not effectively address Bengaluru’s traffic woes. He pointed out several flaws in the project’s detailed report and suggested that greater emphasis should be placed on improving public transport, particularly the Namma Metro and BMTC services. Mohan's criticisms extended to the project’s planning, claiming that the Detailed Project Report (DPR) was prepared hastily within just three months, which he believes is insufficient for such a large-scale project. He emphasised the lack of geotechnical investigations, which are critical for tunnelling projects.
Mohan also criticised the project for conflicting with the city’s Comprehensive Mobility Plan, highlighting that it overlaps with the planned Metro Phase 3A, which also serves the same Hebbal-Silk Board corridor. Experts, including those from the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), have also raised concerns, arguing that the tunnel project may not provide a sustainable solution. Mohan has recommended that the government prioritise investments in Metro and suburban rail systems, as these would offer more reliable and environmentally friendly transportation options for the city’s growing population. Despite the backlash, the government maintains that the tunnel project is essential for addressing Bengaluru’s traffic challenges and improving infrastructure. However, the ongoing debate underscores the need for a more comprehensive and sustainable approach to urban mobility.